BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//JudicialCouncil//NONSGML v1.0//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event28355@trial.court
DTSTAMP:20260403T214523Z
DTSTART:20251008T160000Z
DTEND:20251009T000000Z
SUMMARY:Supreme Court Oral Argument
DESCRIPTION:This is a special outreach session attended by high school students and their
 teachers as an opportunity to learn about the judicial process.
 The live webcast will begin here [1] at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, Oct. 8.
 View the Oral Argument Calendar [2] | Briefs [3]
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 /The following cases are placed upon the calendar of the Supreme Court for
 hearing at its Special Session at the courtroom at Colton Hall Museum, 570
 Pacific Street, Monterey, California, on October 8, 2025.  The public may
 attend in person and also have access to argument via live-streaming on the
 judicial branch website:  https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/ [4]./
 *WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 8, 2025 — 9:00 A.M.*
 /*Opening Remarks: Special Session*/
 (1) */People v. Shaw (Troy Lee), S286453/*
 Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a
 civil action.  This case presents the following issue: Does a hospital have
 a duty to disclose emergency room fees to patients beyond its statutory duty
 to make its chargemaster publicly available?
 (2) /*City of San José v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association et al.,
 S285426*/
 Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a
 civil action. The court limited review to the following issue: Is the
 issuance of pension obligation bonds to finance unfunded pension liability
 subject to the voter-approval requirement of article XVI, section 18,
 subdivision (a) of the California Constitution?
 (3) /*People v. Demolle (Alex), [Automatic Appeal], S159120*/
 This matter is an automatic appeal from a judgment of death.
 *1:30 P.M.*
 (4) /*People v. Kopp (Christi J.) et al., S257844*/
 /(Guerrero, C. J., not participating; Rothschild, P. J. assigned justice pro
 tempore)/
 Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed
 in part judgments of conviction of criminal offenses. The court limited
 review to the following issues: (1) Must a court consider a defendant’s
 ability to pay before imposing or executing fines, fees, and assessments? (2)
 If so, which party bears the burden of proof regarding the defendant’s
 inability to pay?
 [1] https://jcc.granicus.com/player/event/4809
 [2] https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/2025-09/October%208%2C%202025%20OA%20Calendar%20with%20issue%20statements%20-%20FINAL.pdf
 [3] https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/case-information/briefs-argued-cases/october-8-2025-oral-argument-cases
 [4] https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p>This is a special outreach session attended by high school students and their teachers as an opportunity to learn about the judicial process.</p>
 <p>The live webcast will begin <a href="https://jcc.granicus.com/player/event/4809">here</a> at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, Oct. 8.</p>
 <p>View the Oral Argument <a href="https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/2025-09/October%208%2C%202025%20OA%20Calendar%20with%20issue%20statements%20-%20FINAL.pdf">Calendar</a>&nbsp;| <a href="https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/case-information/briefs-argued-cases/october-8-2025-oral-argument-cases">Briefs</a></p>
 <hr />
 <p><em>The following cases are placed upon the calendar of the Supreme Court for hearing at its Special Session at the courtroom at Colton Hall Museum, 570 Pacific Street, Monterey, California, on October 8, 2025. &nbsp;The public may attend in person and also have access to argument via live-streaming on the judicial branch website: &nbsp;<a href="https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/">https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/</a>.</em></p>
 <p><strong>WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 8, 2025 — 9:00 A.M.</strong></p>
 <p><em><strong>Opening Remarks: Special Session</strong></em></p>
 <p>(1) <strong><em>People v. Shaw (Troy Lee), S286453</em></strong><br />
 Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. &nbsp;This case presents the following issue: Does a hospital have a duty to disclose emergency room fees to patients beyond its statutory duty to make its chargemaster publicly available?</p>
 <p>(2) <em><strong>City of San José v. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association et al., S285426</strong></em><br />
 Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. The court limited review to the following issue: Is the issuance of pension obligation bonds to finance unfunded pension liability subject to the voter-approval requirement of article XVI,&nbsp;section 18, subdivision (a) of the California Constitution?</p>
 <p>(3) <em><strong>People v. Demolle (Alex), [Automatic Appeal], S159120</strong></em><br />
 This matter is an automatic appeal from a judgment of death.</p>
 <p><strong>1:30 P.M.</strong></p>
 <p>(4) <em><strong>People v. Kopp (Christi J.) et al., S257844</strong></em><br />
 <em>(Guerrero, C. J., not participating; Rothschild, P. J. assigned justice pro tempore)</em><br />
 Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part judgments of conviction of criminal offenses. The court limited review to the following issues: (1) Must a court consider a defendant’s ability to pay before imposing or executing fines, fees, and assessments? (2) If so, which party bears the burden of proof regarding the defendant’s inability to pay?</p>
LOCATION:
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR