BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//JudicialCouncil//NONSGML v1.0//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event24931@trial.court
DTSTAMP:20260405T085122Z
DTSTART:20230308T170000Z
DTEND:20230308T233000Z
SUMMARY:Supreme Court Oral Argument for March 8, 2023
DESCRIPTION:The live webcast will begin at 9:00 A.M. here [1].
 Each argument is limited to one hour:
 9:00 A.M.
 *(1) People v. Braden (Cory Juan, Jr.), S268925 *#21-345 People v. Braden,
 S268925. (E073204; 63 Cal.App.5th 330; San Bernardino County Superior Court;
 FVI18001116.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed a
 judgment of conviction of criminal offenses.
 * The court limited review to the following issue: What is the latest point
 at which a defendant may request mental health diversion under Penal Code
 section 1001.36?
 *(2) People v. Cooper (Robert), S273134* #22-119 People v. Cooper, S273134.
 (B304490; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; TA140718.)
 Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment of
 conviction of criminal offenses.
 * The court limited review to the following issue: Must any of defendant’s
 sentencing enhancements be vacated due to recent statutory changes
 requiring that the offenses necessary to establish a “ ‘pattern of
 criminal gang activity’ . . . commonly benefited a criminal street gang,
 and the common benefit from the offense is more than reputational” (Pen.
 Code, § 186.22, subd. (e)(1), as amended by Stats. 2021, ch. 699, § 3)?
 *(3) Los Angeles Unified School District v. Superior Court of Los Angeles
 County (Jane Doe, Real Party in Interest), S269608* #21-437 Los Angeles
 Unified School Dist. v. Superior Court, S269608. (B307389; 64 Cal.App.5th
 549; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC659059.) Petition for review 3
 Summary of Cases Accepted and Related Actions During Week of August 30, 2021
 after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for writ of mandate.
 * This case presents the following issue: Does Government Code section 818,
 which bars punitive damages against government defendants, preclude
 recovery under Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1, subdivision (b),
 which permits an award of up to treble damages after a child is sexually
 abused as a result of a cover up?
 1:30 P.M.
 *(4) People ex rel. Garcia-Brower (Lilia) v. Kolla’s Inc., S269456* #21-435
 People ex rel. Garcia-Brower v. Kolla’s Inc., S269456. (G057831;
 nonpublished opinion; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2017-00950004.)
 Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed
 in part the judgment in a civil action.
 * This case presents the following issue: Does Labor Code section 1102.5,
 subdivision (b), which protects an employee from retaliation for
 disclosing unlawful activity, apply when the information is already known
 to that person or agency?
 *(5) Leon (Dora) v. County of Riverside, S269672* #21-409 Leon v. County of
 Riverside, S269672. (E073781; 64 Cal.App.5th 837; Riverside County Superior
 Court; RIC1722990.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed
 the judgment in a civil action.
 * This case presents the following issue: Is immunity under Government Code
 section 821.6 limited to actions for malicious prosecution? (See Sullivan
 v. County of Los Angeles (1974) 12 Cal.3d 710.)
  
 * Oral Argument Calendar for March 8, 2023 Sessions [2]
 -  March 8, 2023 Oral Argument Case Briefs [3]
 [1] https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/3472?&redirect=true&h=a26c0e41d8732e9084f6548bf313b7f4
 [2] https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/2023-02/March%208%202023%20OA%20Calendar%20with%20issue%20statements.pdf
 [3] https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/case-information/briefs-argued-cases/march-8-2023-oral-argument-cases
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p>The live webcast will begin at 9:00 A.M. <a href="https://jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/3472?&amp;redirect=true&amp;h=a26c0e41d8732e9084f6548bf313b7f4">here</a>.</p>
 <p>Each argument is limited to one hour:<br /><br />
 9:00 A.M.<br /><strong>(1) People v. Braden (Cory Juan, Jr.), S268925 </strong>#21-345 People v. Braden, S268925. (E073204; 63 Cal.App.5th 330; San Bernardino County Superior Court; FVI18001116.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment of conviction of criminal offenses.</p>
 <ul><li>The court limited review to the following issue: What is the latest point at which a defendant may request mental health diversion under Penal Code section 1001.36?</li>
 </ul><p><br /><strong>(2) People v. Cooper (Robert), S273134</strong> #22-119 People v. Cooper, S273134. (B304490; nonpublished opinion; Los Angeles County Superior Court; TA140718.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment of conviction of criminal offenses.</p>
 <ul><li>The court limited review to the following issue: Must any of defendant’s sentencing enhancements be vacated due to recent statutory changes requiring that the offenses necessary to establish a “ ‘pattern of criminal gang activity’ . . . commonly benefited a criminal street gang, and the common benefit from the offense is more than reputational” (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (e)(1), as amended by Stats. 2021, ch. 699, § 3)?</li>
 </ul><p><strong>(3) Los Angeles Unified School District v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (Jane Doe, Real Party in Interest), S269608</strong> #21-437 Los Angeles Unified School Dist. v. Superior Court, S269608. (B307389; 64 Cal.App.5th 549; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BC659059.) Petition for review 3 Summary of Cases Accepted and Related Actions During Week of August 30, 2021 after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for writ of mandate.</p>
 <ul><li>This case presents the following issue: Does Government Code section 818, which bars punitive damages against government defendants, preclude recovery under Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1, subdivision (b), which permits an award of up to treble damages after a child is sexually abused as a result of a cover up?</li>
 </ul><p>1:30 P.M.</p>
 <p><strong>(4) People ex rel. Garcia-Brower (Lilia) v. Kolla’s Inc., S269456</strong> #21-435 People ex rel. Garcia-Brower v. Kolla’s Inc., S269456. (G057831; nonpublished opinion; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2017-00950004.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment in a civil action.</p>
 <ul><li>This case presents the following issue: Does Labor Code section 1102.5, subdivision (b), which protects an employee from retaliation for disclosing unlawful activity, apply when the information is already known to that person or agency?</li>
 </ul><p><strong>(5) Leon (Dora) v. County of Riverside, S269672</strong> #21-409 Leon v. County of Riverside, S269672. (E073781; 64 Cal.App.5th 837; Riverside County Superior Court; RIC1722990.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action.</p>
 <ul><li>This case presents the following issue: Is immunity under Government Code section 821.6 limited to actions for malicious prosecution? (See Sullivan v. County of Los Angeles (1974) 12 Cal.3d 710.)</li>
 </ul><p> </p>
 <ul><li><a data-entity-substitution="media" data-entity-type="media" data-entity-uuid="25adfaec-12f8-4d29-8f0f-0ff41f3f016e" href="https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/2023-02/March%208%202023%20OA%20Calendar%20with%20issue%20statements.pdf" target="_blank" title="March 8 2023 OA Calendar with issue statements">Oral Argument Calendar for March 8, 2023 Sessions</a><br />
 -  <a href="https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/case-information/briefs-argued-cases/march-8-2023-oral-argument-cases">March 8, 2023 Oral Argument Case Briefs</a></li>
 </ul>
 
LOCATION:
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR