BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//JudicialCouncil//NONSGML v1.0//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event18683@trial.court
DTSTAMP:20260404T205912Z
DTSTART:20220202T170000Z
DTEND:20220202T200000Z
SUMMARY:Supreme Court Oral Argument for February 2, 2022
DESCRIPTION:(Click the play icon) To view with the case information, visit here [1].
  
  
 /*(*//*1)  */*/Conservatorship of the Person and Estate of Eric B., S261812
 [2]/*
 This case presents the following issue: Does equal protection require that
 persons subject to a conservatorship under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act
 (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5350) have the same right to invoke the statutory
 privilege not to testify as persons subject to involuntary commitments under
 Penal Code section 1026.5 after a finding of not guilty by reason of
 insanity?
 /*(2)  */*/In re Christopher L., S265910 [3]/*
 Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed orders in a juvenile
 dependency proceeding. The court limited review to the following issue: Is
 it structural error, and thus reversible per se, for a juvenile court to
 proceed with jurisdiction and disposition hearings without an incarcerated
 parent’s presence and without appointing the parent an attorney?
 /*(3)  */*/People v. Bloom (Robert Maurice), [Automatic Appeal], S095223
 [4]/*
 This matter is an automatic appeal from a judgment of death.
 [1] https://docs.google.com/gview?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjcc.granicus.com%2FDocumentViewer.php%3Ffile%3Djcc_f6bae2a038d23f35d6a985ab9c4d4949.pdf%26view%3D1&amp;embedded=true
 [2] https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2317290&amp;doc_no=S261812&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmPkw%2BW1BZSSFdUExIMFw0UDxTJSJOJztTUCAgCg%3D%3D
 [3] https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2335229&amp;doc_no=S265910&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmPkw%2BW1BZSSFdUE1JQFQ0UDxTJSNOIztTMCAgCg%3D%3D
 [4] https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=1826902&amp;doc_no=S095223&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmPkw%2BW1BZSSFdUExJQFw0UDxbKiNOTzhTQCAgCg%3D%3D
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p>(Click the play icon) To view with the case information, <a href="https://docs.google.com/gview?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjcc.granicus.com%2FDocumentViewer.php%3Ffile%3Djcc_f6bae2a038d23f35d6a985ab9c4d4949.pdf%26view%3D1&amp;embedded=true">visit here</a>.</p>
 <p> </p>
 <div class="video-embed-field-provider-granicus video-embed-field-responsive-video"><embed width="854" height="480" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" src="//jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2594?redirect=true&amp;autostart=0&amp;embed=1"></embed></div>
 <p> </p>
 <p><span><span><span><em><strong>(</strong></em></span></span></span><span><span><span><em><strong>1)  </strong></em><b><i>Conservatorship of the Person and Estate of Eric B., <a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2317290&amp;doc_no=S261812&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmPkw%2BW1BZSSFdUExIMFw0UDxTJSJOJztTUCAgCg%3D%3D">S261812</a></i></b></span></span></span><br /><span><span><span>This case presents the following issue: Does equal protection require that persons subject to a conservatorship under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (Welf. &amp; Inst. Code, § 5350) have the same right to invoke the statutory privilege not to testify as persons subject to involuntary commitments under Penal Code section 1026.5 after a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity?</span></span></span></p>
 <p pt=""><span><em><strong>(2)  </strong></em><b><i>In re Christopher L., <a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2335229&amp;doc_no=S265910&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmPkw%2BW1BZSSFdUE1JQFQ0UDxTJSNOIztTMCAgCg%3D%3D">S265910</a></i></b></span><br /><span><span><span><span>Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed orders in a juvenile dependency proceeding. The court limited review to the following issue: <span>Is it structural error, and thus reversible per se, for a juvenile court to proceed with jurisdiction and disposition hearings without an incarcerated parent’s presence and without appointing the parent an attorney?</span></span></span></span></span></p>
 <p><span><span><em><strong>(3)  </strong></em><b><i>People v. Bloom (Robert Maurice), [Automatic Appeal], <a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=1826902&amp;doc_no=S095223&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmPkw%2BW1BZSSFdUExJQFw0UDxbKiNOTzhTQCAgCg%3D%3D">S095223</a></i></b></span></span><br /><span><span>This matter is an automatic appeal from a judgment of death.</span></span></p>
 
LOCATION:
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR