BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//JudicialCouncil//NONSGML v1.0//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event18581@trial.court
DTSTAMP:20260404T201936Z
DTSTART:20220112T180000Z
DTEND:20220112T200000Z
SUMMARY:Supreme Court Oral Argument for January 12, 2022
DESCRIPTION:(Click the play icon) To view with the case information, visit here [1].
/*(1) */*/People v. Lopez (Pedro), S261747 [2]/*
#20-181 People v. Lopez (Pedro), S261747*/. /*(F076295; 46 Cal.App.5th 505;
Superior Court of Tulare County; VCF325028TT.) Petition for review after the
Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part a judgment of
conviction of criminal offenses. The court limited review to the following
issue: Did the trial court err by sentencing defendant to 15 years to life
under the alternate penalty provision of the criminal street gang penalty
statute (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b)(4)(B)) for his conviction of
conspiracy to commit home invasion robbery, even though conspiracy is not an
offense listed in the penalty provision?
/*(2) */*/People v. Bracamontes (Manuel), [Automatic Appeal], S139702 [3]/*
This matter is an automatic appeal from a judgment of death.
[1] https://docs.google.com/gview?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjcc.granicus.com%2FDocumentViewer.php%3Ffile%3Djcc_8b5c332b14d50c29142ed5c87aa2ea53.pdf%26view%3D1&embedded=true
[2] https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&doc_id=2317001&doc_no=S261747&request_token=NiIwLSEmPkw%2BWzBZSSFdTE9JUEQ0UDxTJSJOWz5SQCAgCg%3D%3D
[3] https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&doc_id=1871380&doc_no=S139702&request_token=NiIwLSEmPkw%2BWzBZSSFdTE5IQEA0UDxfICBOWzpTUCAgCg%3D%3D
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:(Click the play icon) To view with the case information, visit here.
(1) People v. Lopez (Pedro), S261747
#20-181 People v. Lopez (Pedro), S261747. (F076295; 46 Cal.App.5th 505; Superior Court of Tulare County; VCF325028TT.) Petition for review after the Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part a judgment of conviction of criminal offenses. The court limited review to the following issue: Did the trial court err by sentencing defendant to 15 years to life under the alternate penalty provision of the criminal street gang penalty statute (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b)(4)(B)) for his conviction of conspiracy to commit home invasion robbery, even though conspiracy is not an offense listed in the penalty provision?
(2) People v. Bracamontes (Manuel), [Automatic Appeal], S139702
This matter is an automatic appeal from a judgment of death.
LOCATION:
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR