BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//JudicialCouncil//NONSGML v1.0//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event18492@trial.court
DTSTAMP:20260404T171210Z
DTSTART:20211207T170000Z
DTEND:20211207T200000Z
SUMMARY:Supreme Court Oral Argument for December 7, 2021
DESCRIPTION:(Click the play icon) To view with the case information, visit here [1].
  
 /*(1) */*/Berroteran (Raul II) v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (Ford
 Motor /**/Company, Real Party in Interest), S259522 [2]/*
 This case presents the following issue: Does a party against whom former
 deposition testimony in a different case is sought to be admitted at trial
 under Evidence Code section 1291, subdivision (a)(2), have a similar interest
 and motive at both hearings to cross-examine a friendly witness?
 /*(2)  */*/Lopez (Marisol) v. Ledesma (Glenn) et al., S262487 [3]/*
 This case includes the following issue: Was a physician’s assistant who
 treated a patient without direct physician supervision entitled to invoke the
 limitations of Civil Code section 3333.2 on noneconomic damages?
 /*(3) */*/Sheen (Kwang K.) v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., S258019 [4]/*
 This case presents the following issue: Does a mortgage servicer owe a
 borrower a duty of care to refrain from making material misrepresentations
 about the status of a foreclosure sale following the borrower’s submission
 of, and the servicer’s agreement to review, an application to modify a
 mortgage loan?
 [1] https://docs.google.com/gview?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjcc.granicus.com%2FDocumentViewer.php%3Ffile%3Djcc_80ac770b9d5a89ebed11c181cfee1872.pdf%26view%3D1&embedded=true
 [2] https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&doc_id=2306264&doc_no=S259522&request_token=NiIwLSEmTkg%2BW0BNSCM9VExIMEw0UDxTJiBOUzhTUCAgCg%3D%3D
 [3] https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&doc_id=2319609&doc_no=S262487&request_token=NiIwLSEmTkg%2BW0BNSCM9VENIIDg0UDxTJSI%2BVzJSQCAgCg%3D%3D
 [4] https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&doc_id=2297530&doc_no=S258019&request_token=NiIwLSEmTkg%2BW0BNSCM9VEJIQFg0UDxTJiBeRztRICAgCg%3D%3D
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p>(Click the play icon) To view with the case information, <a href="https://docs.google.com/gview?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjcc.granicus.com%2FDocumentViewer.php%3Ffile%3Djcc_80ac770b9d5a89ebed11c181cfee1872.pdf%26view%3D1&amp;embedded=true">visit here</a>.</p>
 <div class="video-embed-field-provider-granicus video-embed-field-responsive-video"><embed width="854" height="480" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" src="//jcc.granicus.com/player/clip/2479?redirect=true&amp;autostart=0&amp;embed=1"></embed></div>
 <p> </p>
 <p><span><span><em><strong><span><span>(1) </span></span></strong></em><b><i><span>Berroteran (Raul II) v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (Ford Motor </span></i></b></span></span><span><span><b><i><span>Company, Real Party in Interest), <a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2306264&amp;doc_no=S259522&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmTkg%2BW0BNSCM9VExIMEw0UDxTJiBOUzhTUCAgCg%3D%3D">S259522</a></span></i></b></span></span><br /><span><span><span><span><span><span>This case presents the following issue: <span>Does a party against whom former deposition testimony in a different case is sought to be admitted at trial under Evidence Code section 1291, subdivision (a)(2), have a similar interest and motive at both hearings to cross-examine a friendly witness?</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
 <p><span><span><span><em><strong>(2)  </strong></em><b><i>Lopez (Marisol) v. Ledesma (Glenn) et al., <a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2319609&amp;doc_no=S262487&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmTkg%2BW0BNSCM9VENIIDg0UDxTJSI%2BVzJSQCAgCg%3D%3D">S262487</a></i></b></span></span></span><br /><span><span><span><span><span><span>This case includes the following issue: Was a physician’s assistant who treated a patient without direct physician supervision entitled to invoke the limitations of Civil Code section 3333.2 on noneconomic damages?</span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
 <p><span><span><span><em><strong>(3) </strong></em><b><i>Sheen (Kwang K.) v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., <a href="https://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/mainCaseScreen.cfm?dist=0&amp;doc_id=2297530&amp;doc_no=S258019&amp;request_token=NiIwLSEmTkg%2BW0BNSCM9VEJIQFg0UDxTJiBeRztRICAgCg%3D%3D">S258019</a></i></b></span></span></span><br /><span><span><span><span><span><span>This case presents the following issue: Does a mortgage servicer owe a borrower a duty of care to refrain from making material misrepresentations about the status of a foreclosure sale following the borrower’s submission of, and the servicer’s agreement to review, an application to modify a mortgage loan?</span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
 
LOCATION:
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR